Crypto Lobbying Accelerates Amid Rising Political Influence In Washington
Crypto’s relationship with Washington is rapidly evolving as the industry takes a more assertive role in US politics, signaling a shift from outsider status to growing influence across the federal landscape. This week on Byte-Sized Insight, we examine how lobbying, political spending and access are reshaping crypto’s presence in the Capitol and what that may mean for decentralization, market competition and future policy.
Presidential pardons
The recent presidential pardon of Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao catalyzed the conversation, prompting scrutiny into whether crypto’s expanding political footprint is driving outcomes. While some industry figures framed the case as government overreach, critics pointed to lobbying pressure and high-level connections as evidence of swelling influence.
Against that backdrop, crypto advocacy in Washington has accelerated dramatically. According to data shared with Cointelegraph, lobbying expenditures by crypto-aligned entities have climbed sharply since 2021.
“We really saw, I’d say, in 2021 is where we really started to see really jump up,” said Brendan Glavin, director of insights at OpenSecrets. “Prior to that, the industry … hadn’t spent more than like $2.5 million in a year, then in 2021 jumped up to eight and a half.” Glavin said it’s been climbing exponentially since.
Lobby equals maturity
Glavin noted that the pattern mirrors the trajectory of other emerging sectors gaining regulatory attention.
“As soon as that happens, then people start talking about regulation and things that are going to affect how the industry runs. And that is when you see the industry leaders start to say, oh, well, we need to get involved in this Washington game.”
That involvement is no longer limited to traditional lobbying. In the 2024 election cycle, crypto groups adopted a campaign-focused strategy.
Related: ‘There were NO money-laundering’ charges, CZ claps back at Senator Warren
“What crypto interest did in 2024 is said, well, we’re not going to give money to candidates… our main focus is going to be we’re going to form our own super PAC,” Glavin said. Fairshake, the largest crypto PAC, raised over $260 million during the 2023-24 election cycle and spent $195.8 million, according to Open Secrets data.
New developments suggest the trend may accelerate. Beyond PACs, stablecoin issuer Tether is considering establishing a US entity capable of direct political donations ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg reporting shows the industry has amassed about $263 million in anticipated political capital for the cycle, rivaling traditional powerhouse sectors such as Big Oil.
Such activity raises concerns about the concentration of influence, particularly as well-funded players gain access that smaller builders may lack.
“You create a situation where the existing players … are just going to centralize their control because they have the ability to hire people or ability to make their voice heard,” Glavin warned.
Listen to the full episode of Byte-Sized Insight for the complete interview on Cointelegraph’s Podcasts page, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows!
Magazine: Grokipedia: ‘Far right talking points’ or much-needed antidote to Wikipedia?